THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

"This isn't your little brother's animated movie!" 9 movie ads - 9 Film review


"9" film review
'This isn't your little brothers animated movie.....", this line from one of the promos for this movie is true to form when describing this wonderfully animated film from the writer/director Shane Acker. This brilliantly animated film also has some great voice work from some well known actors which include: Elijah Wood, John C. Reilly, Jennifer Connelly, Christopher Plummer, and Martin Landau. The film was produced by Tim Burton, Timur Bekamembetov, Jim Lemley and Dana ginsburg with the basic premise of the film centering around the films main character 9 (Elijah Wood)-a stiched up doll that that I will refer to as a stitch doll and as he awakens and goes out into the world he discovers the world has become a wasteland do to destruction of the fictional animated world we are presented with. It is also evident to the viewer that some major war or battle has occurred that has left the world in its present state.

As our main character 9 walks around he discovers a talisman which unbeknownst to 9 will be a crucial item throughout the entirety of the film. Our man character 9 discovers 2 (Martin Landau) another stitch doll and 2 tells him that there are others like themselves and they're names are 1 (Christopher Plummer), 5 (John C. Reilly), 6(Crispin Glover), 8 (Fred Tatasciore) who have all been hiding, and what they have been hiding from are machine like creatures. The creature are searching for something, this is where the talisman comes into play. It holds the key to something special with a special use to it as well . This talisman will be used for something positive and soulful by the stitchdolls, and for the films villians (the machine creatures) for something negative and controlling.

Throughout the film you are also introduced to some other stitchdolls, 3,4, and 7(Jennifer Connelly) and how they play key roles in the development of the films plot. The films climax allows us to discover who's responsible for the making the stichdolls, the machine creatures, and the cause of the major war that has left the world in its current delapitated state. You also get a resolution to the major conflicts- the inner and outer conflicts.

This animated film had tremendously great action in it and there is even an homage to a scene from one of John Woo's great action films. The film deals with the old issues of man vs machine and the struggle of trying to preserve humanity while also not letting technology take control of it. I thoroughly recommend this film and have to agree that this definitely "Isn't your little brothers animated film" in more ways than one.
Overall grade of the film A-

Randy Watson III,et3
P.S. here is a link to Shane Acker's original short film that inspired the film "9"





EmailThis!

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Game On ! - GAMER Review


"It's me Simon, I'm playing you"......



Well not since Paul Glaser's 1987 Schwarzeneggar starring film, " The Running Man" have we had a film like this one. I first have to say the protagonist and antagonist you were equally matched in this film which will definitely help in enjoying the film. In the future, a new mind-control technology has become popular in society and an online mutliplayer game called "Slayers" is the new rage. Ken Castle( Micheal C. Hall)- antagonist, the man behind the two mind-controlling games"Slayers" and "Society" is seen as a savior by the government and less than a savior by those who don't believe in the mind-control technology. In "Slayers" Death Row inmates are allowed to choose to serve there time in a cell or agree to fight in 30 sessions of the game Slayers and this is under the understanding that if they survive the sessions they will be set free.
In enters our films protagonist Kable/John Tillman(Gerard Butler) who has made it through 27 sessions and lived through them all. This film is a basic battle between good & bad and is also a fight between two men who are fighting for control. Ken Castle(Micheal C. Hall) is fighting for control of the human race and Kable/John Tillman(Gerard Butler) is fighting for his life , as well as his wife and child's freedom.


The action in this film is beyond stupendous and utterly enjoyable. They're great performances from Micheal C. Hall and Gerard Butler and its refreshing to see a film were the protagonist and antagonist were wonderfully matched. We also get to see a funny music number from Michael C. Hall's character performing a well known song done by Frank Sinatra that isn't stupid, but actually works in the film surprisingly. An speaking overall this was an enjoyable action flick with an interesting plot.

Rand Watson III,et3
Overall grade for this film Low B/High C




Saturday, September 5, 2009

"You Silly Basterds...lol" - Inglorious Bsterds Review





"This Just might be my masterpiece!" Lt. Aldo Raine aka "Aldo the Apache"


Well this line from the film opitimizes the whole vibe of the film in more ways than one. The newest installment from director/screenwriter Quentin Tarantino takes you on a tremendously fun ride through a business of sorts..."the killin Nazi business" and after watching the film, business was booming...lol. This film was vintage Tarantino, had everything from the signature QT dialogue, soundtrack and some outstanding performances - one in particular done by Austrian actor(Christoph Walz) who portrays the devious,calculating Colonel Hans Landa. After watching Inglorious Basterds I personally thoroughly enjoyed the film but I do believe its one of those films you have to decide for yourself on whether or not you liked the film. But I personally feel you should always adopt that particular attitude when watching a new film.

The film starts out with the great introduction of Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Walz) in the film and his interrogation of a french family accused of hiding jews from the nazis. This scene was one of Tarantino's best written scenes I have to say it was a wonderful way to open the film and that's all I will say. At the end of the scene we are introduced to a young lady who will play a major part by the films climax , and her name is Shoshanna Dreyfuss(Melanie Laurent).[Pause for a moment I also just had to stop and take a moment to predict like a lot of other viewers who saw the film and that is that Christoph Walz should receive an oscar nomination for his performance, just a little prediction....lol, unpause]

The next chapter we are intoduced to the BASTERDS, a group of Jewish American soldiers who are brought together by Lt. Aldo Raine(Brad Pitt) to form a platoon that does one thing and one thing only and that's killing Nazis. We get to see two of the most interesting Basterds, Staff Sergeant Donny Donowitz aka "The Bear Jew"(Eli Roth) and Hugo Stiglitz (Til Schweiger) who give fun and interesting performances in the film and are definitely memorable.

In the next two chapters we get to see how Shoshanna's life is after the incident that occured in the first chapter of the film and are also introduced to a young Nazi marksman named Frederick Zoller(Sylvester groth)tries to suit young Shoshanna and even coaxes the Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels (Sylvester Groth) into holding the premiere for a new Nazi Propaganda film at the cinema that Shoshanna owns and operates. The Nazis want to show the love for the Third Reich and the whole SS, but young Shoshanna has something else in mind, something more powerful and meaningful. But, Shoshanna isn't the only one with a plan, the Basterds and the British Secret Service have a plan in mind for the Nazis as well-(cue sly smirk...lol). The final chapter, standoff, showdown is beyond memorable and fictionally speaking-history changing.

As I said at the beginning of this review I will leave it up to you the viewer to judge this film for yourself, just don't let the Ennio Morricone style music, Tarantino dialogue, or over-the-top violence sway you in any way....lol.

Overall grade for this film - B+
Randy Watson III,et3

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

A Rabbi's review of Inglorious Basterds,enjoy!





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-irwin-kula/iinglorious-basterdsi-ven_b_269363.html


Inglorious Basterds, Vengeance and Redemption


By RABBI Irwin Kula


source: The Huffington Post


Inglorious Basterds is a powerful, entertaining cinematic experience, but this is not what you want to hear from me, an eighth-generation rabbi whose father escaped the Nazis and immigrated to America from Poland in 1938 with his parents and brother, leaving most of his family behind to be murdered by the Nazis "y'mach shemam" - may their names be erased - the traditional Jewish appellation, added every time one refers to Nazis, to which Mr. Tarantino has given new meaning.

We now have a new genre of Holocaust films, a fun, action-packed Jewish revenge fantasy! After nearly 600 films to date on the Holocaust, the vast majority of which focused on Nazi evil, the persecution, and suffering of Jews, the paradigm has shifted. We now have the first primary process Holocaust film. There may be six million stories in the Holocaust but Inglorious Basterds tells the one we have been afraid to tell about ourselves: the story of what we would really like to do to those Nazis.

The film unambiguously begins, "Once upon a time...," reminding us that we are about to watch a fable, a tale, a dream, a fantasy that alas did not happen or our world would be so different. Inglorious Basterds is a flight of the imagination, a meditation on vengeance, and the cost of not owning and recognizing the feeling that lies deep beneath the surface of many of us: Kill every last one of them. Or as Aldo the Apache (Brad Pitt), leader of the Basterds, says: "We will be cruel to the Germans, and through our cruelty they will know who we are. They will find the evidence of our cruelty in the disemboweled, dismembered, and disfigured bodies of their brothers we leave behind us."

Oh how we wish we could! Removing the Talmudic moral complexity and parsing, the Woody Allen angst, the liberal genteelness and conservative embarrassment from the equation, what we really want is to scalp Nazis, burn Nazis, torture Nazis, murder Nazis, brand Nazis like cattlemen brand cows (or God brands Cain) with their very own swastikas, and brutally bash their heads in with baseball bats. Actually, the last act brings together two Jewish male fantasies - bashing Nazis and being Hank Greenberg. I digress. As Elie Wiesel, Nobel Laureate and most important witness of the Kingdom of Night, teaches: "Some stories are true that never happened."

Lawrence Bender and Harvey and Bob Weinstein deserve great credit for having the courage to back this extraordinary film. Yet, it takes a gentile to go where no Holocaust story has gone before. Personally, I would give Tarantino an honorary membership in the Jewish people (no circumcision required, as he's been hacking, slicing and ruminating about this Jewish vengeance orgy for over a decade) for bringing consciousness of feelings and desires that many Jews could never bring up in mixed company to the screen.

Ahhh, to simply terrorize Nazis and after killing them, to scalp them! I have no idea what gentiles will experience while seeing this movie (and I really am sorry to cluster all gentiles together, especially since Aldo Raine, part Apache Tennessee hillbilly with twang, is not a Jew), but if I'm really honest, this Jew felt twinges of excitement, thrills, chills he's never felt before seeing violence. I don't even go to action films, yet alone violent movies, as they've always turned my stomach. But this one turned me on (though when I awoke the morning after, I had this strange sense of embarrassment over having gotten so into it). Unfortunately, I really enjoyed it!

As similar as Inglorious Basterds is to other Tarantino films, the determinative difference is Inglorious Basterds makes reference to real historical events. People already either love or hate Tarantino films, so this added level of complexity will surely cause great debate. The movie surfaces a fantasy locked in the inner recesses of every Jew's consciousness: getting to riddle Hitler's body with bullets. No more passive Jews, no more persecution, no more victims led to slaughter, no need for righteous gentiles like Schindler to save us, no more overdeveloped superego and pretense of moral superiority. Finally Jews can be just as brutal as the Nazis!

If the reactions I heard the night I saw the film are any indication, most Jews will love this fantasy with great gusto or as a guilty great pleasure, which will make the difference between seeing this film as kosher porn or as a necessary stage in healing an unbearable trauma. Of course a vocal minority will offer some culturally sophisticated politically correct critique that the movie is sacrilege and minimizes and trivializes the Holocaust. And those critics may be right for those who need to see this film ten times or whose only reaction is whooping in up for scalped Nazis but seeing this film once is a must.

Simply loving or hating Inglorious Basterds misses the realization that has gnawed at me since the morning after. Is it possible that all the necessary (and noble) civilizing attempts to respond/make sense/set things right regarding the Holocaust - museums and memorials, theologies and books, curricula, conferences and anti-racist laws and have also been deflections from giving voice to and even feeling the most primal and honest response to the beating, and shooting, and hanging, and burning, and gassing of six million Jews and millions of others? Does the very fact that Tarantino gives us license to enjoy and even relish the violence against Nazis reveal a mustard seed of repression? Inglorious Basterds gives us the most satisfying and gratifying response of all: brutal, unmitigated by any civilizing norms or ideals, cold-blooded, pleasure inducing, murderous rage and vengeance.

Given that the Holocaust, understandably and justifiably, has been central in Jewish and American identity -the U.S. Holocaust Museum visited by millions each year does stand on the Washington Mall - what happens when the most primal response of all is repressed out of a mixture of shame, fear, humiliation, and taboo. What happens when this response is repressed into the third generation - the aftermath of the aftermath - who still hear the clarion call of their elders to Never Forget? Can the repressed desire of wanting to murder those basterds - morph into seeing every enemy as a marked Nazi and into paroxysms of power that indeed turn us into basterds if not bastards?

Twice in the film, Aldo Raine asks Nazis if post-war they intended to burn their uniforms and return to normal life. After each Nazi tells him yes, Aldo viciously (but with great Tarantino artistry) carves out deep bloody swastika in the Nazi's forehead and offers one of the most haunting lines in the film: "I cannot abide that (Nazis are forgotten)." Can we not abide a world in which there are no more Nazis? Do we need a Nazi mark forever etched into our consciousness to know who we are? What will it take to stop seeing the world through the prism of the Holocaust? A band of Inglorious Basterds?

If the film proves anything, it is that we have barely begun to clean up the toxic waste of the Holocaust. There is still plenty of rage and anger that has not risen to the surface. Presently, liberals and conservatives, hawks and doves have a nice happy arrangement. One side makes believe they feel no anger or fear and see evil simply as a social construction to be dealt with by understanding and diplomacy. The other side makes believe it is not nightmares from the past that have made it appropriate to see the Nazi specter in every enemy, to confuse real politic with metaphysical evil. So we become each other's containers for all our repressed and disassociated rage and humiliation and fear - with everyone seeing each other as Nazis - a cornucopia of Nazis.

Jews see Palestinians, Palestinians see Jews, Americans see Arabs, Arabs see Americans, even opponents of health care reform see Barack Obama, and supporters of health care reform see noisy town-hall opponents as Nazis. That which seems so unique has become common. No wonder Inglorious Basterds feels so good to watch. Tarantino, as he always does, has given voice to our unacceptable and dangerous urges - kill those mf's - thereby defusing much tension and anxiety. It sure feels good to finally burn them alive, but when the lights come up, we have to wake up.

Perhaps the insight of waking up the morning after experiencing this film and having to admit, "Unfortunately, I really really enjoyed it," is that we are entitled and need to admit the furious desire for pure vengeance. If we do so, we may even begin to see that healthy people do not want their grandchildren and great grandchildren to Remember the trauma they suffered rather they hope the trauma will be Remembered to be Forgotten. Invited to stare into the Face of Vengeance and admit and own we even enjoyed the killing, maybe we can begin to heal and realize the innocence of suffering can never be redeemed by the exercise of power. For if we could do anything we wanted to anyone to make things right what would we do that could make things right? The suffering of the Nazis' millions of victims can never be fully set right - that is the difference between reality and fantasy - and to think anything to the contrary leaves a world in which the only people standing are a branded Nazi and a couple of Basterds.

Thank you, Quentin Tarantino. You have reminded us, whether you intended to or not, that we are never as powerful as our greatest fantasies and never as powerless as our worst nightmares.

Follow Rabbi Irwin Kula on Twitter: www.twitter.com/irwinkula